WebJul 6, 2024 · A three-judge Bench will issue further directions to ensure implementation of the judgment in Shreya Singhal v Union of India, which declared Section 66 (A) of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (the IT Act) unconstitutional. Through its Orders in this case, the Court must ensure that citizens are not jailed under a law that has already been ... WebJul 1, 2024 · July 1, 2024 Court: Supreme Court of India Case No: Writ Petition (Civil) Nos. 1031 and 1164 of 2024 Citation: Anuradha Bhasin v. Union of India, (2024) 3 SCC 637 Date of Judgement: 10.01.2024 Appellant: Anuradha Bhasin and Ors. Respondents: Union of India (UOI) and Ors. Bench: N.V. Ramana, R. Subhash Reddy and B.R. Gavai, JJ.
5 Years Of Shreya Singhal Judgment - Live Law
WebJul 24, 2024 · The SC upheld the Section 69A of the IT Act, which allows the government to block websites, and was challenged in Shreya Singhal. Alok Prasanna KumarCo-founder, Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy, uses ... The Supreme Court of India invalidated Section 66A of the Information Technology Act of 2000 in its entirety. The Petitioners argued that Section 66A was unconstitutionally vague and its intended protection against annoyance, inconvenience, danger, obstruction, insult, injury, criminal … See more Police arrested two women for posting allegedly offensive and objectionable comments on Facebook about the propriety of shutting down the city of Mumbai after … See more Justices Chelameswar and Nariman delivered the opinion of the Supreme Court of India. The main issue was whether Section 66A of ITA violated the right to freedom … See more painting over a water stained ceiling
WWW.LIVELAW
WebShreya Singhal v. UOI (2015) 5SCC 1 . ... Shreya Singhal v. Union of India(2015) 5 SCC 1 . are ... that as many as 100 cases under Section 66A remain pending in the. WebJan 7, 2016 · Judgment holding section 66A unconstitutional: Shreya Singhal v. UOI , Writ Petition (Criminal) No. 167 of 2012, MANU/ SC/0329/2015. (hereinafter the judgment, for sake of brevity, would be referred as ‘ Section 66A judgment’. Currently, after an amendment in 1898, section 124A IPC states: WebMay 27, 2024 · In the Shreya Singhal’s case, the petitioner had affirmed that those offences which are ambiguous, irrational and discriminatory in nature tend to violate the Article 14 … painting over black mastic basement floor